Tuesday, February 26, 2008

Double-Minded …

… one who is divided in his interests or loyalties, wavering, uncertain, two-faced, half-hearted.

Double Agent…
… a spy who works for two mutually antagonistic countries - (military) a secret agent hired by a state to obtain information about its enemies or by a business to obtain industrial secrets from competitors

Traitor …
… one who betrays another’s trust

Judas…
… One who betrays another under the guise of friendship.

“The enemy of my enemy is my friend …”

To the one who said that … you have been discovered. Too sad this is the legacy you have chosen to leave. You sold your soul, and you did it for naught. Your pearls of wisdom have turned out to be nothing more than meaningless drivel.

19 comments:

Kat said...

Wow! Guess money does talk! I was always taught that if they will do it to you....they will do it to others....beware!!!

Anonymous said...

hey ok we're dying of curiosity here! There were some comments in the fascination thread last week that said "there is a JUDAS in our midst" or whatever!

Anonymous said...

I said that on LCF once. You mean me???

Anonymous said...

No Chelveston! {{hugs}} I mean, Martina -- didn't she say there was a Judas in the fascination thread?

Prudentia said...

No, Chelveston, not you. At least not that I know of. You aren't riding on both sides of the fence, are you? Eh?

Anonymous said...

That's not in my nature, and I'd think it would hurt to have a permanent wedgie.

I have no dog in this fight other than the desire to see justice done.

Just trying to narrow the field.

Kat said...

My guess is there may be more than one Judas amongust us. That's not a role I'd want to play as those Mighty Ducks are tough and don't miss a thing!! Beware....

Anonymous said...

First clue - it might be a Canadian, eh? Or maybe not. Kat's comment is certainly a puzzler. But I have to agree - I've often said if a man leaves his wife for you, your marriage is in trouble. Sounds like a similar situation. Just in case, John T. - watch out. It sounds like a friend falters in her "friendliness."

Prudentia said...

Oh, never fear ... John T is one smart cookie. I'm quite sure he isn't being blindsided.

Anonymous said...

Is this like the Spy that loved me or to Russia with love or what?? LOL

Interesting turn of events Prudentia. Sounds like Messy Marvin has gotten himself in a real pickle, or should that be olive?
This "spy" of sorts hopefully will come clean and spill it...Now how did Bond like his...shaken or stirred?

Prudentia said...

Oh, I think the little spy is going to learn the hard way that when you lay down with dogs, you get up with fleas.

He may like them stirred, but by the time Heidi is done with him, he will likely be shaken ...

MrsMenopausal said...

Oh how I wish I were in the know or just able to watch the process of all this discovery!!
I hope this is something John T can make good use of.
WTG, you guys!!
WOOT! heh :D

Anonymous said...

Prudentia says " the one who said that … you have been discovered. Too sad this is the legacy you have chosen to leave. You sold your soul, and you did it for naught. Your pearls of wisdom have turned out to be nothing more than meaningless drivel"

The one who said ... that stuff about the Judas ... that's got to be Martina then.

So you're saying Martina IS in league with Heidi! Against a common enemy. So who's the common enemy, and why would Martina and Heidi unite against that enemy?

The only common enemies in our opinions would have to be either John Tiedt or else the people in the lawsuit.

We already saw how Martina tried to scare Kat.

So what is Martina doing to the other principals?

What we can't figure out mostly is WHY. Why would Martina be helping Heidi? How does Martina know so much about the lawsuit? Is Martina one of Heidi's business partners at Kimkins?

That doesn't make sense. We still say Martina has got to be Heidi. Heidi is pretending to be Martina, and that's why all the weird crap posted in the fascination thread last week and on the antikimkins blogs -- Heidi is trying to terrorize the lawsuit principals without getting caught, so she made up a sock puppet called Martina's Martini.

Prudentia Martina came here to your blog and had a long conversation with you. Please reveal that conversation. Let the Ducks and Nancies do what they do best -- find the truth.

Kat said...

that spy didn't know what he was doin' when he messed with a bunch of Ducks flying in formation!!

Anonymous said...

Anonymous says "First clue - it might be a Canadian, eh? Or maybe not. Kat's comment is certainly a puzzler. But I have to agree - I've often said if a man leaves his wife for you, your marriage is in trouble. Sounds like a similar situation. Just in case, John T. - watch out. It sounds like a friend falters in her 'friendliness.'"

? ok now this is another cryptic comment ...argh ... plainspeak please!

Anonymous said...

uh that previous comment was by us.

Anonymous said...

From your Feb 17 post:
"Martina’s Martini was a real person. That person felt they had information to share that is pertinent to this case, but had reasons for wanting to stay hidden. That caused them to post in ways that seemed cryptic to most of us – as happens any time any of us is trying to share something without coming right out and saying it. Martina’s Martini felt to do so would put both themselves and another person at risk, so they chose to do things their way. Whether or not their fears were justified is not ours to judge."

Now that you've been duped, care to share with the rest of the class now what this person said to you? Did you actually talk to this person? I'd like to see the other side, with this charleton in action...

Elle said...

MM is most likely NOT a Canadian, as all the comments left by him on my blog originated from California. From the IP address, he's using a cable provider, so the physical location is, most likely, nowhere near Canada.

Prudentia said...

v0xhumana, thanks for giving me my next blog post title! Be sure to read it ... hope it answers your question ... sorry, I won't post the actual posts. Both sides of the conversation were forwarded to John T, though, so if there is anything useful there, it will be used.